Tax Adjustment Issues: FTO Directives

Last Modified: 2024-07-22

LAHORE: District Accounts Offices (DAOs) have informed the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) that the FBR field formations have never issued any guidelines or instructions regarding the adjustment of taxes withheld from salaried individuals.

It was observed during an investigation by the FTO office that salaried individuals are subjected to excess tax deductions under Section 149 at the stage of deduction at source, despite qualifying for the benefit under Clause (2) of Part III of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

All DAOs agree that currently, tax is withheld through an automated SAP system which only provides for monthly deductions at an average rate, with final adjustments made in June each year. This SAP system was configured by AGPR and FBR and adopted by AG Punjab. Consequently, the DAOs have expressed their inability to adjust deductible taxes, even if the salaried individuals provide details of tax deducted under various other withholding sections of the Ordinance.

The FTO had sought information from DAOs in Multan, Khanewal, Muzaffargarh, D.G. Khan, Layyah, and Rajanpur based on complaints from academic teachers regarding excess tax deductions and the subsequent hardships faced by taxpayers.

According to an order issued by the FTO office, it is observed that the current withholding procedure at the DAO level does not align with the intent of the legislature as outlined in Section 149 of the Ordinance.

The FTO has directed the FBR, AGPR, and AG Punjab to implement changes in the SAP module to allow adjustments of tax deducted under various provisions of the Ordinance and tax credits. This will enable timely credit for salaried individuals and pensioners and circumvent the lengthy process of refund issuance as per Section 170 of the Ordinance. Additionally, the FBR is required to develop a robust monitoring mechanism to prevent misuse of the facility at the withholding stage.

© Business Recorder, 2024

Post Comments(0)

  • No comments yet.
  • Login with Google to post a comment

    Related posts

    TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales, Section 111, 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

    The Hon'ble Court ruled that the tax department's treatment of sugar sales as concealment without considering the cost of sales was misdirected. The taxpayer, Mehboob Hussain, received …

    INPUT SALES TAX INADMISSIBILITY, BURDEN OF PROOF ON THE DEPARTMENT - FBR

    The tribunal found significant shortcomings in the ACIR’s assessment, both in terms of factual scrutiny and legal interpretation. The ACIR's failure to adequately examine the provided…

    COMMISSIONER CAN NOT REJECT A LOWER ESTIMATE OF PAYMENT OF ADVANCE TAX, judgment by the High Court of Sindh

    A brief update on a judgment by the High Court of Sindh on “Commissioner Cannot Reject a Lower Estimate of Payment of Advance Tax” is being shared with you for your knowledge.

    Source must be explained: Remittances exceeding Rs5m not added to taxable income: FBR

    The FBR's 2019 circular outlines that foreign remittances over Rs 5M need to be explainable to avoid additional taxes. It details compliance measures for offshore assets, including penaltie…

    The appellate tribunal case, STA No. 251/MB/2024

    The appellate tribunal case, STA No. 251/MB/2024, involves appellant challenging the suspension of their Sales Tax Registration by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR), Multan Zone. The appell…

    Tax Adjustment Issues: FTO Directives

    LAHORE: District Accounts Offices (DAOs) have informed the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) that the FBR field formations have never issued any guidelines or instructions regarding the adjustment of ta…

    Read More >>>>

    Disclaimer:

    The materials in Tax Magazine are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content, the views, findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Tax Magazine or its affiliates.

    We disclaim any liability for losses that may arise from reliance on the information contained on this page.