TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales, Section 111, 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Last Modified: 2024-07-30

TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales, Section 111, 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001


In a case involving taxpayer Mehboob Hussain, the taxpayer supplied sugarcane to a sugar mill and received sugar in consideration instead of cash. This transaction was not declared in the taxpayer's return of income. The tax department treated the sale of sugar as concealment and added it to the taxpayer's income without allowing for the cost of sales.

The Hon'ble Court held that Section 111 is not punitive in nature. Therefore, the lack of verifiable credit given to the appellant was deemed highly misconceived and misdirected. The Assessing Officer (AO) had wrongly added the total amount of the sugar sale to the taxpayer's income without subtracting the purchase price from the sales price. This purchase price should have been considered when making additions under Section 111 of the Ordinance 2001.

The case has been remanded back to the AO for a fresh decision, which must be made strictly in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case 2023 SCMR 534.

 

Source: http://imranghazi.com/mtba/updates/direct/caselaws/default.aspx

Description File Name Downloads Action
TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales 000019-TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales.pdf 021 Download

Post Comments(0)

  • No comments yet.
  • Login with Google to post a comment

    Related posts

    TRIB Mehboob Hussain concealment of sales, Section 111, 122 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

    The Hon'ble Court ruled that the tax department's treatment of sugar sales as concealment without considering the cost of sales was misdirected. The taxpayer, Mehboob Hussain, received …

    INPUT SALES TAX INADMISSIBILITY, BURDEN OF PROOF ON THE DEPARTMENT - FBR

    The tribunal found significant shortcomings in the ACIR’s assessment, both in terms of factual scrutiny and legal interpretation. The ACIR's failure to adequately examine the provided…

    COMMISSIONER CAN NOT REJECT A LOWER ESTIMATE OF PAYMENT OF ADVANCE TAX, judgment by the High Court of Sindh

    A brief update on a judgment by the High Court of Sindh on “Commissioner Cannot Reject a Lower Estimate of Payment of Advance Tax” is being shared with you for your knowledge.

    Source must be explained: Remittances exceeding Rs5m not added to taxable income: FBR

    The FBR's 2019 circular outlines that foreign remittances over Rs 5M need to be explainable to avoid additional taxes. It details compliance measures for offshore assets, including penaltie…

    The appellate tribunal case, STA No. 251/MB/2024

    The appellate tribunal case, STA No. 251/MB/2024, involves appellant challenging the suspension of their Sales Tax Registration by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR), Multan Zone. The appell…

    Tax Adjustment Issues: FTO Directives

    LAHORE: District Accounts Offices (DAOs) have informed the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) that the FBR field formations have never issued any guidelines or instructions regarding the adjustment of ta…

    Read More >>>>

    Disclaimer:

    The materials in Tax Magazine are provided for informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content, the views, findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Tax Magazine or its affiliates.

    We disclaim any liability for losses that may arise from reliance on the information contained on this page.